From the Report to Redvelopment Agency Board for the December 14 RDA meeting:
[With notations by the Woodland Record]
Subject: Status of Downtown Theater Project
Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency Board approve Alternative No. 1.
Alternative Courses of Action
1. Suspend the Downtown Theater Selection Process pending the outcome of the Cinema West project application and direct staff to work with the Friends of the State Theater and other interested parties to develop a plan to restore and reuse the State Theater.
2. Process the Cinema West application and direct staff to draft an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with RCI that would be returned to the Agency Board for consideration in the event that a condition occurs that causes the Cinema West application to stall.
3. Terminate the Downtown Theater Selection Process and continue the required work on the Cinema West application.
The recommended alternative (Alternative No. 1) also recognizes the outpouring of support that was shown for rehabilitation and reuse of the historic State Theater. Staff believes that the Agency should begin discussions with the Friends of the State Theater and other interested parties in order to explore opportunities to restore and reuse the State Theater for a desired community use. Staff has no preconceptions as to what that use should be and should not offer any suggestions until discussions with the community are held. Based on those discussions, it may be appropriate to return to the Agency Board in the future with a request to allocate funds that would facilitate the consideration of ideas for restoration and reuse of the historic building.
[Note: "The outpouring of support" was for Ron Caceres' State Renovation and Expansion project, not just to rehabilitate and reuse the State Theatre. As for the preconceptions, the subcommittee discussed these things at its Nov. 9 meeting: 1) Reject State Theater proposal, 2) Make a commitment to renovate at least the exterior of the facility, 3) Make a commitment to find an end user, 4) Staff is making contact with other communities (show comparison sheet), and considering hiring an entertainment feasibility consultant – Some scenarios, 1) Agency does not buy the State, 2) Agency offers funds for rehab – can control construction through terms of the loan/grant, require competitive selection of architect and contractor, etc., 3) Need to determine what historic features if any community wants restored and the cost, 4) Agency RFPs for end user. Uses $2 million for construction as the incentive. See who comes forward, but aggressively searches for partners/users, 5) State becomes a “theater pub” or regional music venue.]
Read the report here.
The RDA subcommitee that formulated the staff report is:
Mark Deven, RDA executive director
Cynthia Shallit, RDA/Housing manager
Skip Davies, RDA boardmember
Martie Dote, RDA boardmember
Paul Siegel, CDD deputy director, City of Woodland
Tim Kelly, Consultant, Keyser-Marston.
Helen Bean, Project manager, City of Emeryville