Mr. Smythe, your misinformed, only two developers responded to the rfp. It was not as you say "...that city staff and our new mayor don’t feel the need to seek multiple proposals for such an important project as a downtown theatre. Get your fact right.
The way I read the letter is that Mr. Smythe was referring to this paragraph in the article:
"Ironically, during that December 15 meeting city staff recommended to council that the multiplex development project should include sole source negotiations with Petrovich – a Sacramento developer. Two council members siding with city staff were Martie Dote and Art Pimentel. They definitely wanted a multiplex project to be sole sourced to the Petrovich Development Company who would build it on the Hoblit auto dealer site on Main and Third Streets. This contradicted the Implementation Plan Advisory Committee – a group consisting of City Council/RDA appointees – who recommended that a Request For Proposal process be followed so that a multiplex could possibly include the historic State Theatre."
He got his facts right. It is also true that eventually the RDA approved sending the RFP out for two sites, but it is a fact that city staff and Pimentel (the new mayor) and Dote did not "feel the need to seek multiple proposals."
Perhaps the grammar makes it a bit unclear, but Mr. Smythe's message is not... at least to me. He DOES have his facts right. And he DOES NOT own property by the State.
The Woodland Record/The Mail of Woodland is the only community access news source in town. Stay tuned to WoodlandRecord.com for more local stories in words, photos and videos.
The Woodland Journal is a place for discussion on the issues affecting our community. In order to keep debates informative and accessible for all adults, we reserve the right to reject any messages that:
1. Are obscene or abusive
2. Are racist, sexist or homophobic
3. Are personal attacks on other users of this blog
4. Break the law, or encourage others to do so
5. Are defamatory or in breach of copyright
6. Are clearly advertising something for profit
7. Impersonate someone else
8. Are irrelevant to the topic or repeatedly posted
9. Are written by a troll, or are troll-like
10. Are simply unwanted by editors for any reason
If any user of this Web site is dissatisfied with its content, its rules, or the method of comment moderation, the only recourse is to discontinue visitation. Although allowed, the Woodland Journal discourages anonymous comments. While making comments (that we DO encourage), please identify yourself with your name, initials or pseudonym. This will add credibility to your opinion and will enable other users to better track the thread of discussion.
5 comments:
He owns property by the State... might be biased?
No, he doesn't. That is a false statement.
Looks like you nailed another misinformed troll, Dino!
Mr. Smythe, your misinformed, only two developers responded to the rfp. It was not as you say "...that city staff and our new mayor don’t feel the need to seek multiple proposals for such an important project as a downtown theatre. Get your fact right.
10:31,
The way I read the letter is that Mr. Smythe was referring to this paragraph in the article:
"Ironically, during that December 15 meeting city staff recommended to council that the multiplex development project should include sole source negotiations with Petrovich – a Sacramento developer. Two council members siding with city staff were Martie Dote and Art Pimentel. They definitely wanted a multiplex project to be sole sourced to the Petrovich Development Company who would build it on the Hoblit auto dealer site on Main and Third Streets. This contradicted the Implementation Plan Advisory Committee – a group consisting of City Council/RDA appointees – who recommended that a Request For Proposal process be followed so that a multiplex could possibly include the historic State Theatre."
He got his facts right. It is also true that eventually the RDA approved sending the RFP out for two sites, but it is a fact that city staff and Pimentel (the new mayor) and Dote did not "feel the need to seek multiple proposals."
Perhaps the grammar makes it a bit unclear, but Mr. Smythe's message is not... at least to me. He DOES have his facts right. And he DOES NOT own property by the State.
Post a Comment