Excerpts from the Woodland Record:
While the City of Woodland explores red carpet strategies for alternative parking and courthouse siting for the State of California, Yolo County continues to sweep false claims under the rug.
In April, the city began a different approach to satisfy its commitment to the state to provide parking facilities for the New Woodland Courthouse project. Councilman Jeff Monroe stated, "We have been trying to find different alternatives to a parking structure. There are some interesting alternatives that we are looking at... however, we are waiting on the parking study to determine which direction we will take."
Of course, all this red carpet treatment for the purposes of satisfying the state (including city time and money) could have been avoided if the county had kept its commitment to provide the state with its property bounded by Court, Third, North and Fourth Streets - (the Property) where the holding jail and jury parking are currently located. At some point since the autumn of 2007, the county has removed that 2.55 acres from the negotiation table forcing the city and state to seek other sites for the new courthouse – in turn, forcing both agencies to expend resources on the search.
As previously reported in the Record – Jim Perry, executive officer of the Superior Court of Yolo County, was asked what conditions the state did not meet. “I don’t know of any,” he said. And also as previously reported – Kelly Quinn, Senior Manager of Planning of the Office of Court Construction and Management (of the AOC), had not heard of such claims.
On May 29, Philip Carrizosa, a spokesperson for the AOC stated, “It remains our position that we have met the conditions outlined in the county’s resolution."
Contrary to the opinions of those state officials, Rexroad insists the state failed to meet the conditions of the county. He said, "There have been far more meetings and communications about this issue than just those letters. I would guess that meetings, phone calls, and e-mails number in the hundreds."
Apparently, those hundreds of undocumented communications have vanished without revealing the failed conditions. And out of those hundreds of communications, not one shred of evidence that the state failed to meet conditions came from the public records request made by the Record.
Read more at the Woodland Record.