STATE REPS: YAMADA TALKS AROUND THE ISSUE, WOLK AND NIELSEN REFUSE TO COMMENT
Excerpts from the Woodland Record:
TWO THEATER proposals for downtown Woodland are on hold according to Woodland City Councilman Skip Davies.
According to a July 27, 2004, Woodland City Council/Redevelopment Agency communication, then city manager Richard Kirkwood began to firm up a plan for a cinema complex at the corner of Third and Main Streets.
In the document, Kirkwood said: "A master developer could be selected for an Exclusive Right to Negotiate from a select list of qualified developers." That developer is Paul Petrovich, who in 2006 submitted to the city and county his intentions to annex 153.4 acres at County Road 102 between Wintun Avenue and Gibson Road.
“The county did not commit any property to the courthouse relocation project,” said county public information officer Beth Gabor on behalf of all Yolo County supervisors and the county administrator who refused to make individual comments. Gabor later stated that the Administrative Office of the Courts did not meet certain conditions of the resolution.
Jim Perry, executive officer of the Superior Court of Yolo County, was asked what conditions the state did not meet. “I don’t know of any,” said Perry.
So far there is no evidence that the state failed to meet conditions of the county's resolution. In fact, just a week and a half ago on April 3, Philip Carrizosa from the Office of Communications of the Judicial Council of California - Administrative Office of the Courts said, "...the AOC’s formal site selection process for the Woodland Courthouse Project has yet to begin, and is not expected to begin until late June at the earliest."
District 8 Assembly Member Yamada, District 5 Senator Lois Wolk and District 2 Assembly Member Jim Nielsen were each provided a copy of a proposal that suggests: 1) Using part of the promised county property (by building around the facilities that contain the jail, library and public defender), 2) Closing Third Street, 3) Using existing surface parking with a smaller scale structure (there are at least 1,226 spaces available), 4) Creatively using the $173 million budget (including $8 million for site acquisition) and 5) Reallocating some of the $459 million state budget intended for other courthouse parking structures in California.
Both Wolk and Nielsen simply refused to comment on the issue and the proposal delivered to them on February 19.
Yamada was able to muster up a generic response on March 13: "At this time, I remain hopeful that the City, County, and the AOC will continue to work out an agreement and the details to move ahead."
Read more at the Woodland Record.