Monday, May 05, 2008

Dog Gone! Have you heard about this one?


Here's a Friday deadline that snuck up on prospective design firms. The city is requesting qualifications for planning what's dubbed as "Downtown Plaza" and/or "Main Street Plaza." I just now stumbled upon this RFQ (Monday at 6:30) while looking for any updated council minutes. (Note: The city's Web site is still stuck on September 4, 2007.)

I hope the tight, under-played deadline won't exclude truly qualified planners.

There's no mention of Dog Gone Alley in the RFQ notice, but the site in question is on Bush, between College and First. Dog Gone Alley runs through it. By the circuitous description, you would think the proposed plaza is on Main Street. Despite the late notice and meandering description, this project could be an exciting addition for downtown. Click the title of this story to access the RFQ.

Here are some excerpts from the online document:

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Historic Downtown Woodland
Main Street Plaza
Design and Feasibility Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Woodland (Agency) seeks proposals from a multi-disciplinary firm for the design and development of a new outdoor courtyard behind the retail businesses along Main Street in Historic Downtown Woodland. This request is to use outside expertise in defining the details of a potential feasible project.

Proposals should be submitted to:

Redevelopment Agency of the City of Woodland
520 Court Street
Woodland, CA. 95695
Attn: Cynthia Shallit, Redevelopment Manager

Proposals are due no later than 3:00 on Friday, May 9, 2008

THE SITE

Just one block to the west of the Opera House is the area site of the proposed project. It is located in the section identified as the “Downtown Core” district between Elm and Third streets in the Downtown Specific Plan. Included in this area are key landmarks such as the Hotel Woodland, the Porter Building, the Opera House, Dead Cat Alley, the Chinatown site, and Heritage Plaza.

This is a 2.61 acre site - a full city block. It is characterized by 14 storefronts along Main Street and five businesses along First
Street. Behind the buildings is some open space, but most is taken up by the American Legion building and an old car dealership building that was historically referred to as the Meier Car Dealership Building. The building, approximately 20,000 s.f., was constructed in the Moderne style in 1921 and is now mostly vacant except for some storefronts along College Street.

There may some significant infrastructure constraints on this site. Though the utility systems are currently considered adequate, any change in density of use could overburden the infrastructure, or renovation may cause damage. Furthermore, a large condominium project proposed just to the west of the project site may cause proposed near this Project Site consisting of 171 condominiums may cause this block to be inadequately served. For example the Downtown Specific Plan suggests that the existing galvanized water service laterals will need to be replaced with copper pipe. Any unlined pipelines will need to be cement-coated or replaced to improve flow capacity. The sewer line may need to be replaced. Several have commented that the overhead wires are particularly unsightly on this block and every effort should be made to underground them if possible.

A project of this size can be costly to the surrounding property owners and to the Redevelopment Agency. This is why it seems prudent to solicit ideas on the best practices and best approaches to financing redevelopment on this block. Such an analysis has to include considerations of the current economic market, Woodland’s future economic growth and the cost of improvements. Since no one source of funds nor one property owner can expect to improve this area as a single entity the other property owners and stakeholders will need to be brought into the process. Ideally this RFQ will solicit firms that have experience with this kind of project and can apply that knowledge to Woodland.

THE VISION

This block has long been viewed as underutilized with potential for development as a public plaza or parking area. An outdoor courtyard could be created behind the buildings between Main and Bush streets and between College and First streets. It is the Agency’s hope that this would enhance the Downtown’s street life and nightlife by creating a lively, vibrant courtyard area that will support neighboring businesses, especially restaurants and cafes. This could be a pedestrian-friendly environment with connections to Main Street which in turn would increase foot traffic in the area and patronage of local shops/restaurants. It could be the venue for community events such as a Farmer’s Market. Its potential as a dynamic urban destination location is enhanced by the historic buildings adjacent to the block, particularly the Hotel Woodland and the historic Elks building which together create a strong historic fabric.

Because of the long narrow buildings, many of which have functional separate spaces in the back, there might be opportunities to transform this area by providing new entries in the rear of the buildings and possibly a pathway (paseo) linking the courtyard directly to Main Street. Ultimately, this courtyard could consist of outdoor dining opportunities and build on the existing successes of some of the establishments there. Opening up this area could require demolishing the American Legion building and/or possibly the Meier Car Dealership Building.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Wow, some more smart planning from our city officials. Lets Keep this ball rolling and we might just turn things around. Building on, and supporting the existing businesses and spaces is a great in-fill idea.

This idea and the farmers market move to Freeman Park are both ways to invite more foot traffic to our downtown. People want free entertainment in a safe environment. Both of these plans do that.

dino said...

10:19

I agree that the plaza on Bush Street is a great concept!

But... what's not identified is the budget for the consultant. It might be wise to gather input from all the businesses on the block (you don't need a consultant for that) and then see what a developer can come up with once the Meier building is sold. The city may be spending money unnecessarily... especially if the property owners on the block are left out of the initial stages of planning.

Again, I'm not saying it's a bad concept - it's fantastic - but this is another case where the process seems undefined and haphazard. Will there be a fee imposed on all the businesses on that block? How will the plan be executed without a major player (i.e. a new owner of the Meier building who can redevelop the area)?

End notes: The proposed plaza is not in-fill, it's redevelopment. City planners did not move the Farmers Market, the market moved the market.

Anonymous said...

Thank you Dino for the more correct definition of the term "in-fill". My thinking was that we would be using existing spaces but using them more efficiently.

I understand the farmers market is it's own entity. They (the market people) worked really hard for years to be able to get that park.

I think "the plan" of using Dog Gone ally is fantastic. I totally agree with you that the details are another story.

I own a downtown business. I would be willing to discuss this plan as well as others with the City people. The lines of communication need to flow both ways.

Downtown businesses don't mind investing in worthwhile projects. The recent PBID and in-liew parking fees don't fly.

Randal

dino said...

Randal,

I'm wondering how many businesses on the block bordered by Bush, College, Main and First have heard about the city hiring a planner for their properties.

The site (area) has great potential, it would be beneficial if the city wasn't perceived as sneaky or closed-minded as the neighbors give their own ideas.

Anonymous said...

Those of us who read your blog know now. I suspect this is the first we are all hearing about this plan. I too own a business downtown, in fact on the same block as this plan. I have not been notified by anyone from the city yet.

You know what's funny? City Council candidate Bobby Harris just stopped by my store. This plan is one of the topics we discussed. Seems he is really up on these types of things. The other thing is, I can't remember ever getting visited by a Council candidate in the past.

Ice Cream Man

Anonymous said...

I thought this was interesting:

The selection committee will be comprised of the following members:
Assistant City Manager or his designee
Redevelopment Manager
A primary property owner on the site
A Redevelopment Agency Board member or designee
Planning Manager or his designee

One representative from the site and four from the city. I wonder who the "primary" property owner is.

Main Streeter

Anonymous said...

Primary Owner:

Jeff Morgan
Water Development Company

dino said...

How did that process work - pick someone who bought a building from the city?

http://www.cityofwoodland.org/UserFiles/File/City%20Council/Agendas/01_08_2008/07PR.pdf

I'm sure Jeff will be more in tune with what his neighbors would like in their backyard, and he will use good judgement, but c'mon... the city just has to start communicating with those who pay their salaries. They have the unique ability of turning decent ideas into shipwrecks. This process is on a crash course.

dino said...

In addition to the old Imperial Savings Bank building at Main and College, it turns out Jeff Morgan owns the old Meiers Building on College and Bush (across Dog Gone Alley). He bought it in 2004 for $725,000. That would explain why he is the "Primary Owner" on the selection committee. Why wouldn't the city just say that? To me, that's just weird.

Okay... so the Meiers Building was for sale not too long ago. Is it still for sale? If so, why wouldn't the city wait for the new owner to come in and present a plan? If not, what's the deal? Is the city paying for this proposed plan or is Jeff?

Why not simply disclose their full intent? Why limit the plan that includes the whole block to one property owner? Why the down-played RFP? Once again, the city mucks up a good idea from the get-go. There's always more questions than information.

Anonymous said...

Why is it so hard for the City of Woodland to communicate, (in detail) with ALL the parties involved? This ongoing dysfunction should be addressed at each City Council meeting until it is resolved. We have a batch of Council Candidates up for election and re-election. They always ask us for questions. The lack of open communication from our City Staff is a primary concern.

The City has a multitude of issues before them. Water issues, budget issues, economic developement issues, safety issues, and the list goes on... There NEEDS to be a pipeline of free flowing information that can be accessed at any time.

The City has a web site. Most people have access to a computer these days. That should be a no-brainer.

Our City Council is not much better in communicating either. Minutes kept current on their site would help. Posting agenda items as they occur would help too. Waiting till the last minute to post the agenda does not allow the citizens time to research and provide feedback to the Council if needed.

This project has merit. open it up to the public and put a test to the resolve of the people. You might just surprise yourselves.