Everyone's an expert on education
Over the past few days the Daily Democrat has published editorials and Letters to the Editor about our schools. I'd like to address them all at some point, but let's first look at the two letters about Woodland High School's policies. Rachel Nakatani criticizes the limitations of student planners, the five-minute passing period and the crowded lunchtime. Her letter can be accessed by clicking the title of this story. Ada Woodard of Woodland agreed with Ms. Nakatani's assessment in another letter to the Editor. Doesn't it seem like everyone's an expert on education? Let's see what's wrong with the picture that Ms. Nakatani paints...
1) Ms. Nakatani doesn't like student planners because her child can't leave class more than 58 times during the year to go to the bathroom, visit the nurse, visit the counselor, visit the library or get a drink. I can tell you as an educator that teachers provide passes to see the nurse, for going to the library or to see the counselor (or counselors send for students with their own passes). This leaves the planner to accommodate 58 trips to the bathroom or for a drink of water. That's more than enough "hall passes" for bathroom and water needs.
2) She claims the five minute passing period is not enough time to go to the locker, use the restroom, get a drink of water, and walk to class. She further claims the bathrooms are "flooded with people trying to save a spot on their limited-space hall pass." This is called learning time management. High school students should be able to save trips to the locker by taking the appropriate amount of books. Many high schools nowadays don't even use, or don't even have lockers. I realize that young ladies need to use the restrooms more than male students, but I question the validity that the WHS bathrooms are "flooded with people." Here's some insight: The passing period is not a social period. Students need to do their business and pick up the pace to get to class. To be fair, at some point Number Two will reach critical mass (or another downstairs occurrence will beckon attention) during passing time, but teachers are fully aware of the need to accommodate such emergencies.
3) Ms. Nakatani doesn't like the internal boundaries of the school at lunchtime, especially the inaccessibility of certain classrooms to get help or for AP lab use. Hmmm... who is supposed to supervise the students in classrooms or labs at lunch? She is suggesting (and assuming) that teachers give up their contracted lunch time and space because her AP child is too inconvenienced. Of course, the two-week waiting period for an off-campus permit is also too long for her child. Suggestion: Teach your child consideration and patience.
4) She also claims that the limited lunch boundaries and long lines prohibit students from purchasing food and drink at vending machines and the food court. Suggestion: Pack your kid a lunch... or better yet, your child can make his/her own lunch to learn nutrition and economy. (Lunch from vending machines? Wow.)
5) Ms. Nakatani contends that the new lunch boundaries were made because gangs once claimed that territory. Now she suggests the gangs moved to another location but their old locations are still sealed off. Although I don't doubt that gang-wannabes gathered in another spot, I do doubt the direct correlation she makes. She is basically insinuating that administrators are not aware of student congregations and are allowing an unsafe environment. When I went to WHS, the athletes had their area, the brainiacs had theirs, the FFAers had theirs, the Latinos had theirs, the thespians had theirs, etc., etc. Welcome to California public schools... kids congregate with their own kind in certain areas. This hasn't changed in 30 years.
In a nutshell - I agree that there are probably logistical challenges at WHS, but the conditions that Ms. Nakatani describe are nothing more than exaggerations to disguise her coddling. Your kid is in high school now - it's time to learn grown-up things.






